<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BizOp Blogs &#187; Small Business Government Policies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bizopblogs.com/category/small-business-government-policies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bizopblogs.com</link>
	<description>Small Business Opportunities For Entrepreneurs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 01:57:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How President Obama Can Fix Small Businesses, Not Provide Band-Aids</title>
		<link>http://bizopblogs.com/2009/03/18/how-president-obama-can-fix-small-businesses-not-provide-band-aids/</link>
		<comments>http://bizopblogs.com/2009/03/18/how-president-obama-can-fix-small-businesses-not-provide-band-aids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Dion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Small Business Government Policies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bizopblogs.com/?p=767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Americans for Tax Reform: On Monday, the Obama Administration announced a series of government-focused solutions for America’s small business sector. Unfortunately, none of them involve long-term ideas to incentivize small businesses to be created or hire more employees. Below are ten ideas President Obama could get started on right away to help America’s struggling small [...]
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://bizopblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/barack-obama.jpg" alt="barack-obama" title="barack-obama" width="184" height="150" class="thumb" /></p>
<p><a href="http://atr.org/">Americans for Tax Reform</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>On Monday, the <a href="http://brazilbusiness.biz/2009/03/16/obama-announces-plan-to-aid-small-businesses/">Obama Administration announced a series of government-focused solutions for America’s small business sector</a>. Unfortunately, none of them involve long-term ideas to incentivize small businesses to be created or hire more employees.</p>
<p>Below are ten ideas President Obama could get started on right away to help America’s struggling small business sector&#8230;</p>
<p>1. <strong>Remove the looming tax hike on most small business profits</strong>. Since small businesses pay their income taxes on their owners’ tax returns, increasing personal income tax rates is a tax hike on small business profits. In fact, at least $2 out of every $3 in small business profits is earned in households making at least $200,000 per year. So the Pelosi-Reid-Obama plan to raise the top two tax rates is a direct tax hike on the lion’s share of small business profits. It’s like a Sword of Damocles hanging over the heads of small business owners</p>
<p>2. <strong>Cut the top marginal tax rate</strong>. Since most small business profits are taxed in the top two brackets, these tax brackets should be cut, not raised. A good principal should be that nobody should have to pay more than 25% of their income in taxes. Any rates higher than this should be cut down to 25%. This would be an immediate cut for small businesses, and would remove the current rate structure’s bias against future small business profits. Firms with fewer than 100 employees account for over one-third of employment in America. Cutting this tax rate will put more people to work</p>
<p>3. <strong>Cut the self-employment tax rate</strong>. Small businesses organized as sole proprietorships or general partnerships must pay two layers of tax—the income tax, and a “self-employment tax” (which is equivalent to the employer plus the employee “shares” of the FICA tax). As a result of the interaction of these two parallel tax structures, growing small businesses often face higher marginal income tax rates than established small businesses. This is unfair, and imposes ridiculously-high marginal tax rates on modest business profits. The self-employment tax should be cut in half to a flat rate of 7.65% (1.45% after the Social Security wage base is exceeded), the same rate faced by the employee’s “share” of FICA</p>
<p>4. <strong>Allow full business expensing</strong>. Small businesses are already allowed to expense business purchases today, but only up to $250,000 in assets purchased (there are also other limitations).  Any asset purchases not eligible for expensing must be slowly-deducted, or depreciated, over many years.  For small business owners, a tax cut delayed is a tax cut denied. The cap on small business expensing should be lifted, and all other limitations removed.  This will incentivize small businesses to invest more in growing their firms</p>
<p>5. <strong>Uncap small business contributions to retirement plans</strong>. It’s no secret that America is facing a retirement savings crisis. The looming threat of Social Security’s bankruptcy conspires with a halved stock market and a low savings rate to foil our retirement safety. One easy solution to help turn things around would be to uncap the amount that small businesses could contribute to owner and employee retirement plans. Anything contributed should be deductible against both income and self-employment tax. There should be no contribution limits at all.  Now more than ever, America needs to hyper-charge retirement savings</p>
<p><a href="http://atr.org/president-obama-fixbr-small-businesses-provide-a3011">Read full article</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bizopblogs.com/2009/03/18/how-president-obama-can-fix-small-businesses-not-provide-band-aids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 List Of Biz Opps In The Stimulus Bill</title>
		<link>http://bizopblogs.com/2009/03/09/top-10-list-of-biz-opps-in-the-stimulus-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://bizopblogs.com/2009/03/09/top-10-list-of-biz-opps-in-the-stimulus-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Opportunities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business Government Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bizopblogs.com/?p=754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Virtual Entrepreneur: The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act was signed into law by President Barack Obama on Feb. 16, 2009. It is massive, not only in dollar amount ($787 billion), but also in length (781 pages, single-spaced). The legislation represents about $1 billion of tax and appropriation benefits per page. Here are 10 of the [...]
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://bizopblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/top-ten.jpg" alt="top-ten" title="top-ten" width="202" height="81" class="thumb" /></p>
<p><a href="http://brazilbusiness.biz/2009/03/09/top-10-list-of-biz-opportunities-in-the-stimulus-bill/">Virtual Entrepreneur</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act was signed into law by President Barack Obama on Feb. 16, 2009. It is massive, not only in dollar amount ($787 billion), but also in length (781 pages, single-spaced).<br />
The legislation represents about $1 billion of tax and appropriation benefits per page.</p>
<p>Here are 10 of the surprising, little known opportunities for businesses buried within this massive legislation:</p>
<p>1. <strong>Extension of bonus depreciation</strong>. The federal stimulus package extends last year’s 50-percent write-off of the cost of depreciable property for capital expenditures. Wisconsin businesses can extend this temporary benefit for capital expenditure incurred in 2009.</p>
<p>2. <strong>New Market Tax Credits</strong>. Available New Markets Tax Credits are increased to $5 billion for 2009 and 2010. Wisconsin developers, who have the opportunity to receive allocations for qualified projects, will enjoy an economic boost to projects during the current challenging economy.</p>
<p>3. <strong>Creation of renewable energy grants</strong>. In recognition of the recent constriction in the market for production and investment tax credits, Congress is allowing for-profit taxpayers that place in service a wide variety of renewable energy facilities to receive a grant from the Treasury Department in lieu of claiming a production or investment tax credit for those facilities. The grant will be equal to a percentage of the taxpayer’s basis in depreciable tangible personal and real property (not including buildings) that is used as an integral part of the facility. This grant opportunity should serve to provide a significant financial boost to qualified renewable energy projects in Wisconsin.</p>
<p>4. <strong>Creation of credit for investment in advanced energy property</strong>. Congress authorized $2.3 billion in tax credits for certain advanced energy property. The credit will be equal to 30 percent of a taxpayer’s basis in certain depreciable tangible personal or real property (excluding buildings) related to any project that re-equips, expands or establishes a manufacturing facility for the production related to various identified renewable energy resources. This represents an exciting opportunity for Wisconsin suppliers of component parts for renewable energy products.</p>
<p>5. <strong>Increase in the amount of energy conservation bonds from $2.4 billion to $3.2 billion</strong>. This increase in a financing source should serve to mitigate the current restrictive lending practices that apply to qualified energy projects.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.biztimes.com/news/2009/3/6/top-10-list-of-business-opportunities-in-the-stimulus-bill">More here</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bizopblogs.com/2009/03/09/top-10-list-of-biz-opps-in-the-stimulus-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tight Credit Becomes Problem For Small-Business Owners</title>
		<link>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/10/01/tight-credit-becomes-problem-for-small-business-owners/</link>
		<comments>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/10/01/tight-credit-becomes-problem-for-small-business-owners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 11:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Small Business Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business Government Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business Loan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bizopblogs.com/2008/10/01/tight-credit-becomes-problem-for-small-business-owners/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[USAToday: As lawmakers debate the proposed financial bailout bill, small-business owners — who are especially vulnerable to financial meltdowns — face even tighter credit than usual. They’re tapping credit cards and personal savings as it gets harder to land bank financing. They appear to be hoarding their cash, anticipating worse economic times. And unless the [...]
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://bizopblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/tight-loans.jpeg' alt='tight-loans.jpeg' class="thumb"/></p>
<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/smallbusiness/2008-09-28-small-business-credit-crunch_N.htm?csp=34">USAToday</a>: </p>
<blockquote><p>As lawmakers debate the proposed financial bailout bill, small-business owners — who are especially vulnerable to financial meltdowns — face even tighter credit than usual.</p>
<p>They’re tapping credit cards and personal savings as it gets harder to land bank financing. They appear to be hoarding their cash, anticipating worse economic times. And unless the rescue bill frees up credit, they’ll likely find it harder to get federally guaranteed loans.</p></blockquote>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/10/01/tight-credit-becomes-problem-for-small-business-owners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rule Change To Provide Vets More Contracting Opportunities</title>
		<link>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/08/22/rule-change-to-provide-vets-more-contracting-opportunities/</link>
		<comments>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/08/22/rule-change-to-provide-vets-more-contracting-opportunities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Opportunities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Biz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business Government Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business Spotlight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bizopblogs.com/2008/08/22/rule-change-to-provide-vets-more-contracting-opportunities/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nextgov: The Veterans Affairs Department wants to put companies owned by veterans at the top of the pecking order for agency contracting opportunities. VA published a proposed rule change on Wednesday in the Federal Register that would establish a set-aside program for veteran-owned and service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses. &#8220;Supporting service-disabled veterans who own businesses contributes [...]
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://bizopblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/key-to-opportunities.jpg' alt='key-to-opportunities.jpg' class="thumb"/></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nextgov.com/">Nextgov</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Veterans Affairs Department wants to put companies owned by veterans at the top of the pecking order for agency contracting opportunities.</p>
<p>VA published a proposed <a href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/e8-19261.htm">rule change</a> on Wednesday in the Federal Register that would establish a set-aside program for veteran-owned and service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses.</p>
<p>&#8220;Supporting service-disabled veterans who own businesses contributes significantly in restoring their quality of life while enhancing transition from active duty to civilian life,&#8221; the rule stated. &#8220;Such acquisitions maintain the socioeconomic well-being of the nation and carry out VA&#8217;s strategic goals.&#8221;</p>
<p>The proposed rule builds off a 2004 <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/10/20041021-5.html">executive order</a> issued by President Bush that mandated increased contracting and subcontracting opportunities for veteran-owned and service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses. <a href="http://www.nextgov.com/nextgov/ng_20080821_5928.php">More</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/08/22/rule-change-to-provide-vets-more-contracting-opportunities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>401(K)S Offer Unique Benefits In Small Businesses</title>
		<link>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/08/18/401ks-offer-unique-benefits-in-small-businesses/</link>
		<comments>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/08/18/401ks-offer-unique-benefits-in-small-businesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business Government Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bizopblogs.com/2008/08/18/401ks-offer-unique-benefits-in-small-businesses/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. News &#038; World Report: Running a small business can be a life-consuming process, so sometimes small-business owners miss the forest for the trees. Maybe that&#8217;s why only about 16 percent of businesses with fewer than 50 employees in the United States have 401(k) plans. Small-business owners are so focused on developing their businesses that [...]
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://bizopblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/401ks.jpg' alt='401ks.jpg' class="thumb"/></p>
<p><a href="http://www.usnews.com/">U.S. News &#038; World Report</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Running a small business can be a life-consuming process, so sometimes small-business owners miss the forest for the trees. Maybe that&#8217;s why only about 16 percent of businesses with fewer than 50 employees in the United States have 401(k) plans. Small-business owners are so focused on developing their businesses that some do not realize that those assets can grow at a much faster rate for their retirement under the right plan. An October survey by ING DIRECT&#8217;s ShareBuilder401k, which designs 401(k) plans for small businesses, found that &#8220;not enough employees&#8221; was the top reason cited by small-business owners as to why they do not have a 401(k) plan. That&#8217;s despite the fact that even sole proprietorships with no other employees can have 401(k)&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Of course, that&#8217;s not to say that small-business owners can&#8217;t use other retirement plans like IRAs. But there are some unique benefits to 401(k)&#8217;s. In 2001, Congress changed the laws in a way that allowed self-employed people to put more money into their 401(k)&#8217;s. Today, a business owner under 50 with a 401(k) can invest up to $46,000 a year into the account, with up to $15,500 ($20,500 if over 50) coming from his or her own income, and then up to 25 percent of the business&#8217;s profits under the &#8220;profit sharing&#8221; provision. Regardless of the size of the profits, the total amount cannot exceed $46,000 (or $51,000 if you&#8217;re over 50), but that can make a huge difference. That $46,000 &#8220;can drop you a tax bracket,&#8221; says Stuart Robertson, general manager of Sharebuilder401k. &#8220;That is a great tax shelter for these folks.&#8221;</p>
<p>But if, like many small-business owners, you&#8217;re not very familiar with 401(k)&#8217;s, what do you need to know before you get your own plan started? <a href="http://www.usnews.com/articles/business/small-business-entrepreneurs/2008/08/15/what-small-business-owners-need-to-know-about-401ks.html">Read on&#8230;</a></p></blockquote>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/08/18/401ks-offer-unique-benefits-in-small-businesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Economic Stimulus Benefits For Small Biz</title>
		<link>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/06/25/economic-stimulus-benefits-for-small-biz/</link>
		<comments>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/06/25/economic-stimulus-benefits-for-small-biz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 05:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Dion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Small Biz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business Government Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bizopblogs.com/2008/06/25/economic-stimulus-benefits-for-small-biz/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Entrepreneur Daily: If you’re wondering how the economic stimulus package can help you grow and expand your business, check out SBA’s new tax savings resource center. The website http://www.sba.gov/stimulus includes a fact sheet with a clear explanation of small business tax benefits gained from the package, in addition to a depreciation calculator and an online [...]
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://bizopblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/economic-stimulus.JPG' alt='economic-stimulus.JPG' class="thumb"/></p>
<p><a href="http://www.entrepreneur.com/blog.html?id=194684">Entrepreneur Daily</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>If you’re wondering how the economic stimulus package can help you grow and expand your business, check out SBA’s new tax savings resource center. </p>
<p>The website http://www.sba.gov/stimulus  includes a fact sheet with a clear explanation of small business tax benefits gained from the package, in addition to a depreciation calculator and an online seminar.</p>
<p>The economic stimulus package includes the following tax incentives for businesses:</p>
<p>* A 50 percent bonus depreciation allowance on equipment purchased and placed in service in calendar 2008.</p>
<p>* An almost 100 percent increase in the amount that a business can expense for equipment purchased and placed in the business tax year beginning in 2008 (from $128,000 to $250,000).</p>
<p>“The stimulus package is designed to spur the economy by putting money back into the pockets of American workers and encouraging small businesses to invest and expand,” SBA acting administrator Jovita Carranza said. </p>
<p>“However, many small-business owners are unaware of how it can boost their bottom line. In the roundtables I held with dozens of small-business owners last week on tax policy, many were amazed to learn how much their companies could benefit from the temporary tax incentives in the package.”</p></blockquote>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/06/25/economic-stimulus-benefits-for-small-biz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Increasing Appeal Of Starting A Biz</title>
		<link>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/06/24/an-increasing-appeal-of-starting-a-biz/</link>
		<comments>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/06/24/an-increasing-appeal-of-starting-a-biz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Dion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biz Startup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business Government Policies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bizopblogs.com/2008/06/24/an-increasing-appeal-of-starting-a-biz/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York Times: For many female entrepreneurs, necessity is the mother of their venture. Take Carla Schneider, 40, of Orange, whose product, the WubbaNub, a silicon pacifier with a small stuffed animal attached, has been used in neonatal intensive care units and by mothers of fussy babies around the country. Ms. Schneider invented it during [...]
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://bizopblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/carlaschneider.jpg' alt='carlaschneider.jpg' /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/">New York Times</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>For many female entrepreneurs, necessity is the mother of their venture. Take Carla Schneider, 40, of Orange, whose product, the WubbaNub, a silicon pacifier with a small stuffed animal attached, has been used in neonatal intensive care units and by mothers of fussy babies around the country.</p>
<p>Ms. Schneider invented it during the first family vacation that she and her husband, Bret, took with their son, also Bret, now 9. </p>
<p>Three months old at the time, Bret would sleep only with a pacifier in his mouth, but it kept falling out.</p>
<p>“He was a very colicky baby, and that pacifier was something that was golden to me,” Ms. Schneider recalled. So she sewed it onto a stuffed animal that Bret liked to cling to, and it stayed put.</p>
<p>“I got stopped on the street numerous times for a couple months after that, so I basically kind of took the ball and ran with it,” said Ms. Schneider, a former special education teacher who followed in the entrepreneurial footsteps of her mother, who runs a nonprofit agency. </p>
<p>For women who want flexible hours, autonomy, and the chance to profit from ideas their corporate bosses often overlook, nap time is very much over.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/22/nyregion/nyregionspecial2/22Rwomenct.html?_r=1&#038;ref=nyregionspecial2&#038;oref=slogin">Full story</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Photo</strong>: <em>Thomas McDonald</em> / <strong>The New York Times</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/06/24/an-increasing-appeal-of-starting-a-biz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Small Business Owners Can Learn From Hollywood</title>
		<link>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/04/28/what-small-business-owners-can-learn-from-hollywood/</link>
		<comments>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/04/28/what-small-business-owners-can-learn-from-hollywood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Dion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Small Business Government Policies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bizopblogs.com/2008/04/28/what-small-business-owners-can-learn-from-hollywood/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following article appears on cnn.com. Read it carefully before deciding you can cut expenses by cutting back on the tazes you pay in your business&#8211; Actor Wesley Snipes was sentenced Thursday to three years in prison for failing to file tax returns. Despite surprising the court with a $5 million down payment on his [...]
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following article appears on <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/04/25/smbusiness/snipes_jail_time.fsb/index.htm?postversion=2008042516">cnn.com</a>. Read it carefully before deciding you can cut expenses by cutting back on the tazes you pay in your business&#8211;</p>
<p><em>Actor Wesley Snipes was sentenced Thursday to three years in prison for failing to file tax returns. Despite surprising the court with a $5 million down payment on his outstanding tax balance, Snipes received the maximum jail time requested by federal prosecutors.</p>
<p>&#8220;The three-year sentence sends a loud and crystal-clear message to any would-be tax defier that if you engage in this illegal conduct, you can and will go to prison,&#8221; said Nathan Hochman, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department&#8217;s tax division.</p>
<p>The case&#8217;s lead prosecutor, U.S. Attorney Robert O&#8217;Neill, echoed that assessment. </p>
<p>&#8220;The courts sent a really clear message that Americans must file and pay taxes,&#8221; he said. &#8220;If you have a legitimate dispute with the IRS, contact the IRS and dispute what you believe you&#8217;re due and owe. You can&#8217;t just totally fail to satisfy your legal obligation like Mr. Snipes did.&#8221; </p>
<p>Stop overpaying the IRS<br />
Snipes went on trial in January for failing to file income taxes returns between 1999 and 2004, during which he made an estimated $38 million from movie projects such as the popular vampire trilogy Blade. Prosecutors said that Snipes also fraudulently filed for $11 million in refunds on income taxes paid in 1996 and 1997.</p>
<p>Snipes&#8217; attorneys argued that their client innocently fell victim to poor tax advice provided by his two co-defendants, Eddie Ray Kahn and Douglas Rosile. </p>
<p>Kahn and Rosile were both convicted in February on felony charges of tax fraud and conspiracy. They were sentenced yesterday to 10 years and 54 months in jail, respectively. </p>
<p>Snipes was convicted on three misdemeanor counts but was acquitted of serious felony charges, a verdict that was seen as a victory in the eyes of some tax protestors. </p>
<p>However, insurance analyst JJ MacNab, who is working on a book about the tax-protest movement, believes that the sentencing has sent a wake-up call to members of the defiant community, many of whom are small-business owners. </p>
<p>&#8220;There are people who are saying that they didn&#8217;t argue his case correctly,&#8221; she said. &#8220;But others realize that if Snipes can&#8217;t do it with a team lawyers, how can they?&#8221;</p>
<p>In his statement to the court, Snipes apologized for his &#8220;mistakes&#8221; but steered clear of acknowledging intentional wrongdoing, according to observers. </p>
<p>&#8220;[Snipes] said he was sorry for his actions but he never used the word &#8216;crimes&#8217; and he never used the word &#8216;tax,&#8217;&#8221; said Hochman, who was present when U.S. District Judge William Terrell Hodges announced the sentence in Ocala, Fla. &#8220;I think it&#8217;s an indication that Mr. Snipes, to this day, has not fully accepted responsibility for his actions.&#8221; </p>
<p>In addition to the jail time, Snipes, 45, is being charged millions by the IRS for back taxes, penalties and interest. Defense attorney Linda Moreno declined to comment about her client&#8217;s sentence, but said that a notice of appeal will be filed within the next few days.</p>
<p>Prosecutor O&#8217;Neill said he&#8217;s confident the ruling will stand.</p>
<p>&#8220;In my opinion that was an error-free trial,&#8221; he said. &#8220;In order to succeed in an appeal, you have to point to something that occurred in the trial that denied the individual due process of law. I don&#8217;t see that happening.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/04/28/what-small-business-owners-can-learn-from-hollywood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Issues (Part 3)&#8211;Equal Employment Opportunity Information</title>
		<link>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/03/25/legal-issues-part-3-equal-employment-opportunity-information/</link>
		<comments>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/03/25/legal-issues-part-3-equal-employment-opportunity-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Dion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Small Business Government Policies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bizopblogs.com/2008/03/25/legal-issues-part-3-equal-employment-opportunity-information/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to their website, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) makes equal employment opportunity policy and approves most litigation. It has five commissioners and a General Counsel appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Commissioners are appointed for five-year, staggered terms. The term of the General Counsel is four years. The President designates [...]
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to their website, <a href="http://www.eeoc.gov/abouteeoc/commission.html">the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) </a>makes equal employment opportunity policy and approves most litigation. It has five commissioners and a General Counsel appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Commissioners are appointed for five-year, staggered terms. The term of the General Counsel is four years. The President designates a Chair and a Vice Chair. The Chair is the chief executive officer of the Commission. The General Counsel is responsible for conducting EEOC enforcement litigation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), the Equal Pay Act (EPA), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). </p>
<p>In this capacity, an adversarial relationship often develops between the government and small businesses. The regulations and potential for severe penalties<span id="more-172"></span> often position small business owners to mistrust and avoid the EEOC all together. That is really unfortunate, because it is not the EEOC&#8217;s purpose to shut down or otherwise persecute small businesses. Their stated purpose is working to assure fair treatment for everyone in the area of employment. There is notrhing inherent in that purpose which is bad for business. In fact, there is no conflict between the EEOC&#8217;s work and the profit margin of American business. In fact, the two actually go hand in hand. </p>
<p><a href="http://sbinformation.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?zi=1/XJ/Ya&#038;sdn=sbinformation&#038;cdn=money&#038;tm=118&#038;gps=114_8_1012_493&#038;f=00&#038;tt=14&#038;bt=0&#038;bts=0&#038;zu=http%3A//www.eeoc.gov/employers/smallbusinesses.html">About.Com has published some excellent information </a>that all Small Business owners should print out and keep in a safe place for future reference. Here is some of what they have to say-</p>
<p><em><strong>What laws does the EEOC enforce and do they apply to my business?</strong></p>
<p>Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) prohibits race, color, religion, sex, and national origin discrimination. Title VII applies to:<br />
<strong>employers with fifteen (15) or more employees </strong></p>
<p>Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) prohibits age discrimination against individuals who are forty (40) years of age or older. The ADEA applies to:<br />
<strong>employers with twenty (20) or more employees </strong></p>
<p>Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) prohibits employment discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities. The ADA applies to:<br />
<strong>employers with fifteen (15) or more employees</strong> </p>
<p>Equal Pay Act of 1963 (EPA) prohibits wage discrimination between men and women in substantially equal jobs within the same establishment. The EPA applies to:<br />
<strong>most employers with one or more employees </strong></p>
<p>These laws prohibit employment discrimination based on race, color, sex, religion, national origin, age, disability, and prohibit retaliation for opposing job discrimination, filing a charge, or participating in proceedings under these laws.</p>
<p><strong>How do I determine if a business of my size is covered by the EEO laws?</strong></p>
<p>All employees, including part-time and temporary workers, are counted for purposes of determining whether an employer has a sufficient number of employees. An employee is someone with whom the employer has an employment relationship. The existence of an employment relationship is most easily shown by a person&#8217;s appearance on the employer&#8217;s payroll, but this alone does not necessarily answer the question. Determining whether an employer has enough employees to be covered by these laws is, ultimately, a legal question. This subject is addressed in:</p>
<p>&#8211;EEOC Enforcement Guidance on Equal Employment Opportunity Commission &#038; Walters v.<br />
     Metropolitan Educational Enterprises, Inc. and,<br />
&#8211;Section 2 of the new Compliance Manual on &#8220;Threshold Issues.&#8221;</p>
<p>Independent contractors are not counted as employees. Determining whether an individual is, under the law, an independent contractor, also is a legal question that may not be as easy to answer as you might think. For more information on how to determine whether a person is an &#8220;employee&#8221; or an &#8220;independent contractor&#8221; visit Section 2 of the new Compliance Manual on &#8220;Threshold Issues</p>
<p>If you are unsure whether your business is covered, or whether an individual who works for you is covered, you may wish to consult with an attorney.</p>
<p><strong>Who may file a charge of discrimination with the EEOC?</strong></p>
<p>Anyone who believes that his or her employment rights have been violated because of race, color, sex, religion, national origin, age, disability or because of retaliation may file a charge of discrimination with EEOC. By law, EEOC must accept the filing of a charge.</p>
<p><strong>When can a charge of discrimination be filed?</strong></p>
<p>In most geographic areas, a charge must be filed with EEOC within 300 days from the date of the alleged discrimination. In a very small number of areas where a state or local employment discrimination law does not apply, a charge must be filed within 180 days.</p>
<p><strong>Can a small business resolve a charge without undergoing an investigation or facing a lawsuit?</strong></p>
<p>Yes. EEOC has a free mediation program. The program is voluntary and all parties must agree to take part. The mediation process is also confidential. Neutral mediators provide employers and charging parties the opportunity to reach mutually agreeable solutions. If the charge filed against your company is eligible for mediation, you will be notified by the EEOC of your opportunity to take part in the mediation process. In the event that mediation does not succeed, the charge is referred for investigation.</p>
<p><strong>What employment records must I keep?</strong></p>
<p>EEOC Regulations require that employers keep all personnel or employment records for one year. If an employee is involuntarily terminated, his/her personnel records must be retained for one year from the date of termination. Under ADEA recordkeeping requirements, employers must also keep all payroll records for three years. Additionally, employers must keep on file any employee benefit plan (such as pension and insurance plans) and any written seniority or merit system for the full period the plan or system is in effect and for at least one year after its termination.</p>
<p>Under Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) recordkeeping requirements applicable to the EPA, employers must keep payroll records for at least three years. In addition, employers must keep for at least two years all records (including wage rates, job evaluations, seniority and merit systems, and collective bargaining agreements) that explain the basis for paying different wages to employees of opposite sexes in the same establishment.</p>
<p>Remember, these requirements apply to all employers covered by Federal anti-discrimination laws, regardless of whether a charge has been filed against the employer. When a charge has been filed, employers have additional recordkeeping obligations.</p>
<p><strong>What reports must small employers file with EEOC?</strong></p>
<p>In addition to material that is connected to the issues raised with the investigation of a charge of discrimination, the EEOC also collects EEO-1 Reports from some employers, regardless of whether a charge has been filed against the company.</p>
<p><strong>Employment Information Report (EEO-1) </strong></p>
<p>An EEO-1 Report is filed annually and provides a breakdown of the employer&#8217;s work force by race and gender. Small employers are not required to file EEO-1 reports unless they:</p>
<p>&#8211;employ 100 or more employees<br />
&#8211;employ 50 or more employees and have Federal contracts totalling $50,000 or more. </p>
<p>The processing of EEO-1 reports filed by employers is handled by the EEOC&#8217;s Joint Reporting Committee. Further information on filing EEO-1 reports, including reporting instructions and report forms in various formats, can be obtained by  contacting the EEO-1 Joint Reporting Committee at 866-286-6440 (toll free) or e1.techassistance@eeoc.gov.</p>
<p><strong>I received a charge form from the EEOC that says my business violated federal law. How can the EEOC say this before anyone has even talked to me or asked for my side of the story?</strong></p>
<p>While there are a few rare exceptions, ordinarily the charge must be filed by a member of the public who has contacted EEOC and alleged that a company has discriminated against him or her. The fact that the EEOC has taken a charge does not mean that the government is accusing you of discrimination. The charging party has alleged that your company has discriminated against him or her and it is the EEOC&#8217;s job to investigate the matter to determine whether there is reasonable cause to believe that discrimination has occurred.</p>
<p><strong>How will I know if a charge of discrimination has been filed against my company?</strong><br />
EEOC will notify the employer within 10 days of receiving a charge. Notification normally includes a copy of the charge briefly identifying the charging party, the basis (e.g., race, religion, sex, etc.) and issue(s) (e.g., hiring, promotion, discharge, etc.) of the allegation, and the date(s) of the alleged discrimination. Ordinarily, a plain language explanation of the EEOC charge process will be included, as well as explanations of the employer&#8217;s obligation to retain records pertaining to the charge and of the non-retaliation provisions of the EEOC laws. An invitation to mediate the charge may also be included in the notification package.</p>
<p><strong>What can I expect to happen in an EEOC investigation?</strong></p>
<p>After a charge is filed, you may be asked to provide a statement of position responding to the allegations in the charge. You may also be asked to provide documents or information related to the subject of the EEOC&#8217;s investigation. Additionally, the EEOC may ask to visit your worksite or to interview some of your employees. Cooperation with EEOC requests for information is helpful to the EEOC in investigating charges. When an employer refuses to provide information, or does not do so in a reasonably timely manner, the EEOC may issue a subpoena. You may retain an attorney to represent you during the EEOC&#8217;s handling of the charge but you are not required to do so.</p>
<p><strong>What records am I required to keep if I receive an EEOC charge?</strong></p>
<p>The EEOC Notice of Charge form that you receive should explain the agency&#8217;s record keeping requirements. When an EEOC charge has been filed against your company, you should retain personnel or employment records relating to the issues under investigation as a result of the charge, including those related to the charging party or other persons alleged to be aggrieved and to all other employees holding or seeking positions similar to that held or sought by the affected individual(s).</p>
<p>Once a charge is filed, these records must be kept until the final disposition of the charge or any lawsuit based on the charge. When a charge is not resolved after investigation, and the charging party has received a notice of right to sue, &#8220;final disposition&#8221; means the date of expiration of the 90-day statutory period within which the aggrieved person may bring suit or, where suit is brought by the charging party or the EEOC, the date on which the litigation is terminated, including any appeals.</p>
<p><strong>My records are not in the format requested by the EEOC. It will be too costly and time-consuming to comply with the request. What should I do?</strong></p>
<p>Talk to the EEOC investigator before submitting information in a format different from that requested or refusing to comply altogether. Explain what business records you have and how you believe you could supply the information in a manner closely resembling the manner requested. Most of these situations can be worked out so that EEOC gets the information it needs without the employer feeling unduly burdened.</p>
<p><strong>The EEOC sent me a Notice of Charge which contains very little information about a claim of discrimination. Nothing was attached and I can&#8217;t tell what this is about. What should I do?</strong></p>
<p>The EEOC generally sends notice to employers that a charge has been filed within 10 days after the charge is filed. We may occasionally give you notice of a charge without actually including a copy of the charge. When this happens, ordinarily you need do nothing more until we contact you at a later date. However, if you want more information, call the EEOC office that sent the notice and speak with the staff person assigned to handle the charge to obtain more information.</p>
<p><strong>I believe that the EEOC Charge filed against my company is frivolous. Should I respond?</strong></p>
<p>Yes. You should respond. Under the EEOC&#8217;s current procedures, if the EEOC believes the charge is invalid or frivolous, it will dismiss the charge. If the charge was not dismissed by the EEOC when it was received, there is usually some basis for proceeding with further investigation. There are many cases where it is unclear whether discrimination may have occurred and an investigation is necessary. You are encouraged to present the facts available to you that you believe show the allegations are false.</p>
<p><strong>Can I take action against an employee who has filed a charge?</strong></p>
<p>No. The EEOC-enforced statutes contain strong protections against retaliation for having filed an EEOC charge, even if the charge is later dismissed by the EEOC or rejected by a court.</p>
<p><strong>What should I do to prevent retaliation against and preserve relationships with current employee charging parties?</strong></p>
<p>The charge should be treated confidentially. If the charging party is a current employee, make sure no employee retaliates against the person filing the charge. Make clear to employees who file charges that their relationship with the company will not be affected. As to former employees, be sure that the EEOC filing does not affect the nature of any references given.</p>
<p><strong>Does the EEOC sponsor seminars or activities where I can learn more about complying with the equal employment laws?</strong></p>
<p>&#8211;EEOC representatives are available, on request and at no cost, to provide information and<br />
    answer questions about EEOC laws and procedures through presentations and meetings<br />
    with employers and employer groups or organizations. If you are interested, see No-Cost<br />
    Outreach. For additional information, contact EEOC&#8217;s Local Customized Training Contacts.<br />
&#8211;The EEOC&#8217;s Technical Assistance Program Seminars (TAPS) are designed to educate<br />
   employers and provide technical assistance related to the federal anti-discrimination laws.<br />
   TAPS programs are offered across the country on a fee-for-service basis. To find out when<br />
   and where EEOC&#8217;s TAPS programs will be given in your area, see EEOC Technical Assistance<br />
   and Training Programs.<br />
&#8211;If you are interested in specific on-site training designed to meet your particular business&#8217;<br />
   needs and circumstances, EEOC can develop and deliver customized training at your<br />
   business location on a fee-for-service basis. </p>
<p><strong>What publications can I order to help me comply with the employment laws?</strong></p>
<p>EEOC publications (including the texts of the laws enforced by the EEOC, facts about employment discrimination, and enforcement guidances and related documents) are available free of charge. You may place an order by using the EEOC Publications Request Form or by contacting the following office:</p>
<p>U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Clearinghouse<br />
8280 Greensboro Drive, Suite 300<br />
McLean, VA 22102</p>
<p>Fax: (703) 821-2098<br />
or call: 1-800-669-3362 (voice)<br />
1-800-800-3302 (TTY)</p>
<p>Employers who have questions about the laws enforced by EEOC or about compliance with those laws in specific workplace situations may contact one of the following people:</p>
<p><strong>Albuquerque</strong> Albert Sanchez   albert.sanchez@eeoc.gov  505/248-5210 </p>
<p><strong>Atlanta</strong> Terrie Dandy   terri.dandy@eeoc.gov  404/562-6811 </p>
<p><strong>Baltimore</strong> Mary Tanner   mary.tanner@eeoc.gov   410/209-2721 </p>
<p><strong>Birmingham </strong> Beverly B. Hinton   beverly.hinton@eeoc.gov   205/212-2082 </p>
<p><strong>Boston</strong>  Robert Sanders   robert.sanders@eeoc.gov   617/565-3191 </p>
<p><strong>Buffalo </strong> Elizabeth Cadle   elizabeth.cadle@eeoc.gov   716/551-4443 </p>
<p><strong>Charlotte</strong> Billy Cramon Sanders   billy.sanders@eeoc.gov   704/344-6735 </p>
<p><strong>Chicago</strong> Rita B. Coffey   rita.coffey@eeoc.gov   312/353-7254 </p>
<p><strong>Cincinnati</strong>  Wilma Javey   wilma.javey@eeoc.gov   513/684-2379 </p>
<p><strong>Cleveland </strong>  Michelle Crew   michelle.crew@eeoc.gov   216/522-7651 </p>
<p><strong>Dallas </strong>  Rodney Klein   rodney.klein@eeoc.gov   210/281-7666 </p>
<p><strong>Denver</strong>  Patricia McMahon   patricia.mcmahon@eeoc.gov   303/866-1344 </p>
<p><strong>Detroit</strong> Jesse Vidaurri   jesse.vidaurri@eeoc.gov   313/226-7635 </p>
<p><strong>El Paso</strong> Rodney Klein  rodney.klein@eeoc.gov   210/281-7666 </p>
<p><strong>Fresno</strong> Santos Albarran   santos.albarran@eeoc.gov   213/894-1045 </p>
<p><strong>Greensboro</strong> Jose Rosenberg   jose.rosenberg@eeoc.gov   336/547-4080 </p>
<p><strong>Greenville</strong>  Patricia Fuller   patricia.fuller@eeoc.gov   864/241-4410 </p>
<p><strong>Honolulu</strong> Timothy Riera  timothy.riera@eeoc.gov   808/541-3722 </p>
<p><strong>Houston </strong> Joe Bontke   joe.bontke@eeoc.gov   713/209-3436 </p>
<p><strong>Indianapolis</strong> PhyllisTucker-Wells phyllis.tucker-wells@eeoc.gov317/226-7469<br />
<strong>Jackson </strong>  Linda Walker   linda.walker@eeoc.gov   601/948-8435 </p>
<p><strong>Kansas City</strong>  Jack Vasquez   lloyd.vasquez@eeoc.gov   314/539-7944 </p>
<p><strong>Little Rock</strong>  Debra Moser   debra.moser@eeoc.gov   501/324-6372<br />
<strong><br />
Los Angeles</strong>  Santos Albarran   santos.albarran@eeoc.gov   213/894-1045 </p>
<p><strong>Louisville</strong>  Phyllis Tucker-Wells phyllis.tucker-wells@eeoc.gov 317/226-7469</p>
<p><strong>Memphis</strong>   Debra Moser   debra.moser@eeoc.gov   501/324-6372 </p>
<p><strong>Miami</strong>  Nitza Wright   nitza.wright@eeoc.gov   305/808-1791 </p>
<p><strong>Milwaukee</strong>  Maria E. Flores   maria.flores@eeoc.gov   414/297-3594 </p>
<p><strong>Minneapolis</strong>  Maria E. Flores   maria.flores@eeoc.gov   414/297-3594 </p>
<p><strong>Nashville</strong>  Sarah Smith   sarah.smith@eeoc.gov   615/736-5824</p>
<p><strong>Newark </strong>  Corrado Gigante   corrado.gigante@eeoc.gov   973/645-5978<br />
<strong><br />
New Orleans</strong>  Tydell A. Nealy   tydell.nealy@eeoc.gov   504/595-2838 </p>
<p><strong>New York </strong>  Bryan White   bryan.white@eeoc.gov   212/336-3670 </p>
<p><strong>Norfolk</strong>  Marilyn Booker   marilyn.booker@eeoc.gov   757/441-3135 </p>
<p><strong>Oakland</strong>  Michelle Nardella   michelle.nardella@eeoc.gov   510/637-3239 </p>
<p><strong>Oklahoma City </strong> Jack Vasquez   lloyd.vasquez@eeoc.gov   314/539-7944 </p>
<p><strong>Philadelphia</strong>  Stephen Cuyjet   stephen.cuyjet@eeoc.gov   215/440-2664 </p>
<p><strong>Phoenix</strong>   Krista Watson   krista.watson@eeoc.gov   602/640-4995 </p>
<p><strong>Pittsburgh </strong>  Joseph Hardiman   joseph.hardiman@eeoc.gov   412/644-2623<br />
<strong><br />
Raleigh</strong>  Billy Cramon Sanders   billy.sanders@eeoc.gov   704/344-6735 </p>
<p><strong>Richmond </strong> Patricia W. Glisson   patricia.glisson@eeoc.gov   804/771-2164 </p>
<p><strong>San Antonio</strong>   Rodney Klein   rodney.klein@eeoc.gov   210/281-7666<br />
<strong><br />
San Diego</strong>  Santos Albarran   santos.albarran@eeoc.gov   213/894-1045<br />
<strong><br />
San Francisco</strong>  Michael Baldonado   michael.baldonado@eeoc.gov   415/625-5614 </p>
<p><strong>San Jose</strong> Hea Jung Atkins   heajung.atkins@eeoc.gov   408/291-4236 </p>
<p><strong>San Juan</strong>  Nitza Santos Wright   nitza.wright@eeoc.gov   305/530-6024 </p>
<p><strong>Seattle </strong>  Rod Ustanik   roderick.ustanik@eeoc.gov    206/220-6850 </p>
<p><strong>St. Louis</strong>  Jack Vasquez   lloyd.vasquez@eeoc.gov   314/539-7944 </p>
<p><strong>Tampa</strong>   Sylvia Pouncy   sylvia.pouncy@eeoc.gov   813/228-2310<br />
<strong><br />
Washington, DC</strong>  Andrea Okwesa   bronwen.okwesa@eeoc.gov    202/419-0729</p>
<p>Or, if you prefer, you may write to EEOC&#8217;s Office of Legal Counsel and seek informal guidance.<br />
Written inquiries should be addressed to:</p>
<p>Office of Legal Counsel<br />
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission<br />
1801 L Street, N.W.<br />
Washington, D.C. 20507</p>
<p></em></p>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/03/25/legal-issues-part-3-equal-employment-opportunity-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop Overpaying The IRS</title>
		<link>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/02/28/stop-overpaying-the-irs/</link>
		<comments>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/02/28/stop-overpaying-the-irs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 02:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Small Business Government Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business Strategies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bizopblogs.com/2008/02/28/stop-overpaying-the-irs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the economy slowing and Washington threatening to boost audits of small businesses, it&#8217;s time to rethink your tax strategy. FORTUNE Small Business: There are two proven paths to building wealth: You can increase the amount of money you make, or you can increase the amount of money you keep. Chances are you devote abundant [...]
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>With the economy slowing and Washington threatening to boost audits of small businesses, it&#8217;s time to rethink your tax strategy</em>. </p>
<p><img src='http://bizopblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/irs.jpg' alt='irs.jpg' class="thumb"/></p>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/">FORTUNE Small Business</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>There are two proven paths to building wealth: You can increase the amount of money you make, or you can increase the amount of money you keep. </p>
<p>Chances are you devote abundant time and energy to the first strategy, meaning you&#8217;re utterly consumed with developing new products or breaking into new markets. But the second path tends to get less consideration, particularly because one of the primary ways of keeping more money is paying lower taxes. </p>
<p>Taxes are painful not only to pay but to think about. Taxes are complex. Figuring out ways to shave your tax bill is not why you went into business. </p>
<p>But ignore the subject at your peril. In an effort to shore up a record deficit, the <a href="http://www.irs.gov/">IRS</a> is increasingly targeting small businesses for audits and has made no secret of the fact. <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/22/smbusiness/overpaying_IRS_cover.fsb/index.htm?postversion=2008022511">More</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/02/28/stop-overpaying-the-irs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simplifying Business Activity Taxes</title>
		<link>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/02/18/simplifying-business-activity-taxes/</link>
		<comments>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/02/18/simplifying-business-activity-taxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Dion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Small Business Government Policies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bizopblogs.com/2008/02/18/simplifying-business-activity-taxes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are a small business owner who only does business within the state where your business resides, you may not even know what Business Activity Taxes (BAT) are. But if you do business outside your state, you are painfully aware of them. A Business Activity Tax is levied by states on out of state [...]
No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are a small business owner who only does business within the state where your business resides, you may not even know what Business Activity Taxes (BAT) are. But if you do business outside your state, you are painfully aware of them. A Business Activity Tax is levied by states on out of state businesses to recoup the lost tax revenue they feel they are owed because of that business’s activity in their state.</p>
<p>Good news may be on the horizon. <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/independentstreet/2008/02/15/going-to-bat-for-simplified-business-activity-taxes/?mod=googlenews_wsj">According to a Wall Street Journal report</a>&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-69"></span></p>
<p><em>&#8220;The House Committee on Small Business yesterday explored the toll that business-activity taxes – known as “BAT” – take on small businesses that do business in states other than their own&#8230;.Increasingly, the committee noted, states are increasing these taxes and collecting them more aggressively. The taxes can run high even when sales seem relatively low. “We are seeing cases where entrepreneurs are charged a $400 BAT for less than $100 of total sales in a state,” said Committee Chairwoman Nydia Velazquez [D-N.Y.], in a news release. One example the committee points to: A South Carolina software company with $100,000 in annual sales that was required by the state of New Jersey to pay $500 in annual corporate tax, plus a $100 filing fee, because its software was used in the state. (And that included some years in which annual revenues from New Jersey residents were as low as $49.)&#8221;</em></p>
<p>In order to relieve the burden BATs place on business owners, the House Committee on Small Business has introduced a bill designed to make the taxes more palatable for businesses, including creating a federal standard for levying them, so they are at least more predictable. The bill is called the  <a href="http://www.boucher.house.gov/images/business%20activity%20tax%20simplification%20act%20of%202008%20introduced.pdf">Business Activity Tax Simplification Act of 2008</a> Small business owners should begin writing their congress people and make clear their support for this bill. The difference could be multiple thousands of dollars per year, depending on how often you do business out of state. </p>
<p>You may be saying, &#8220;Noe of this applies to me, because I only do business within my own state.&#8221; That&#8217;s where you are now&#8211;but other business owners just like you depend on inter-state business for their livelihood. Besides, as your business grows and expands, you may be doing inter-state business yourself one day. So, whether it directly effects your business right now or not, get on the phone and tell your congress people to support the Business Activity Tax Simplification Act of 2008.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/businesswire/feeds/businesswire/2008/02/08/businesswire20080208005462r1.html">According to Forbes.com</a>, </p>
<p><em>&#8220;The Consumer Electronics Association (CEA)(R) applauds the introduction of the Business Activity Tax Simplification Act (BATSA) by Representatives Rick Boucher (D-VA) and Bob Goodlatte (R-VA)&#8230;.The Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) is the preeminent trade association promoting growth in the $161 billion U.S. consumer electronics industry. More than 2,200 companies enjoy the benefits of CEA membership, including legislative advocacy, market research, technical training and education, industry promotion and the fostering of business and strategic relationships. CEA also sponsors and manages the International CES &#8211; Where Entertainment, Technology and Business Converge. All profits from CES are reinvested into CEA&#8217;s industry services.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Michael Petricone, senior vice president, Government Affairs, CEA said, </p>
<p><em>&#8220;No taxation without representation is a basic American principle. Congress has a constitutional responsibility to ensure that interstate commerce is not harmed by unfair or burdensome taxation. This developing patchwork of state levies on non-resident firms creates a chilling effect that inhibits commerce and innovation. The burden falls heaviest on small businesses that do not have the resources to contest these ill-founded taxes.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>The bill is currently in the House Judiciary Committee. It must clear that committee before being brought to the house floor for a vote. So, it is imperative to let your voice be heard.</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bizopblogs.com/2008/02/18/simplifying-business-activity-taxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.826 seconds -->

